Scan-and-Solve for Rhino

Simulate Early, Simulate Often... In Rhino

Ernest McCrank
  • Male
  • North Vancouver, British Columbia
  • Canada
Share on Facebook Share Twitter

Ernest McCrank's Friends

  • Bob McNeel

Ernest McCrank's Discussions

WISH - expand material drop-down to show text extents

Hi Folks,Pretty self-explanatory. Not sure if you're constrained by some column width thing or what, but it really only makes sense to be able to see the full material descriptions - particularly for…Continue

Started May 4, 2012

Setup for earthquake scenario
3 Replies

Thanks for the webinar today. I enjoyed it. Michael, you quickly described how you would setup loads/forces in order to simulate an earthquake. I didn't quite catch it, but would really like to get…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Bob Johansson Jan 29, 2012.

Stress Jumping Gap?
2 Replies

I've just had a result from a very loosey-goosey setup I created as a quick moch-up. The values are not accurate, but purely for visual feedback for me. Anyhow, the result seems strange to me. I've…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Ernest McCrank Jul 21, 2011.

Version 1.1 - thanks, and small wish
1 Reply

Thank you for the updated load dialogue in V1.1. Much more user friendly. The vector load is waaay nicer now. I have one wish: I would find it really helpful to be able to 'flip' the vector. If this…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Vadim Shapiro May 14, 2011.

 

Ernest McCrank's Page

Latest Activity

Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

WISH - expand material drop-down to show text extents

Hi Folks,Pretty self-explanatory. Not sure if you're constrained by some column width thing or what, but it really only makes sense to be able to see the full material descriptions - particularly for those with differentiation shown after x amount of characters.Thanks,ErnestSee More
May 4, 2012
Bob Johansson replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Setup for earthquake scenario'
"Earthquake structureal strength is commonly done using static models according to the building code."
Jan 29, 2012
Ernest McCrank replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Setup for earthquake scenario'
"I see (guess I should have checked the documentation:). Thanks for the quick response Vadim. Makes sense. Cheers, Ernest"
Jan 18, 2012
Vadim Shapiro replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Setup for earthquake scenario'
"I think that Michael needs to rest after the webinar :-)     So let me answer.   Obviously,  you are not going to simulate a real earthquake with a linear static model of elasticity.    Proper…"
Jan 18, 2012
Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

Setup for earthquake scenario

Thanks for the webinar today. I enjoyed it. Michael, you quickly described how you would setup loads/forces in order to simulate an earthquake. I didn't quite catch it, but would really like to get further clarification on it.Would you please expand on how 'body loads' are used in simulating earthquake scenarios?Thanks,ErnestSee More
Jan 18, 2012
Ernest McCrank replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Stress Jumping Gap?'
"Ah yes. Should have thought of that.   Thanks Vadim!"
Jul 21, 2011
Vadim Shapiro replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Stress Jumping Gap?'
"Ernest,  it looks like a resolution problem.  See a note in this page  in the documentation on missing small features.  To guarantee that a particular feature is fully resolved,  then the size of the element should be…"
Jul 21, 2011
Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

Stress Jumping Gap?

I've just had a result from a very loosey-goosey setup I created as a quick moch-up. The values are not accurate, but purely for visual feedback for me. Anyhow, the result seems strange to me. I've attached an image to show what I'm talking about. The strain appears to 'jump' across a gap in the model. There are essentially 2 flat plates joined only by a coil spring, yet the strain appears to jump the gap as though it were a continuous plate. I'm curious as to why this would happen, as I know…See More
Jul 21, 2011
Vadim Shapiro replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'Version 1.1 - thanks, and small wish'
"Ernest,  glad you like the new interface.  You are correct about load vector behavior,  and we will consider the 'flip' option in the future releases.   But for now,  note that indicating negative values is…"
May 14, 2011
Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

Version 1.1 - thanks, and small wish

Thank you for the updated load dialogue in V1.1. Much more user friendly. The vector load is waaay nicer now. I have one wish: I would find it really helpful to be able to 'flip' the vector. If this were the case, it would allow you  to (without drawing preliminary load construction geometry) pick a point for loading and then pull the vector away from it - flip it, and voila! Or am I mistaken here with load vectors? Does it matter which side of a face the vector moves to/from? Thanks…See More
May 13, 2011
Ernest McCrank commented on Vadim Shapiro's blog post 'What is the most important feature of Scan&Solve?'
"Thanks for the response Vadim. And I'm looking forward to the tweak to the "GO' button!!!    I hear you on the units scenarios. Maybe it's not doable - but boy, it would be fantastic if the "popup analogy"…"
Feb 14, 2011
Ernest McCrank commented on Vadim Shapiro's blog post 'What is the most important feature of Scan&Solve?'
"Hi Vadim,   I agree that simplicity is key for SnS to deliver the experience many of us are looking for from a "meshless" analysis tool within Rhino. I will use this opportunity to restate some of my comments from the…"
Feb 11, 2011
Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

Security Cage

This 'cage' is a security barrier for an underground parking garage. The 'blocks' shown are intended to represent a climber's feet. I just threw them in place an boolean-ed them on. I'mgetting the impression that this FEA has much to do with creatingjigs...I've been wanting to get an idea of how the structure will react tocurious folks climbing on it. It also allows me to check differentconfigurations, stock types, etc. My process with SnS has not been highly scientific at all. Using…See More
Aug 13, 2010
Ernest McCrank replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'plans for flow analysis?'
"Thanks for the info Vadim. There is plenty that I can do with SnS as it is. I've been able to do a few quick tests on things that I've been dying to know actually, so thanks for making the beta version available for us! I have had a…"
Aug 11, 2010
Vadim Shapiro replied to Ernest McCrank's discussion 'plans for flow analysis?'
"In principle, the technology can be used with any and all types of boundary value problems. You are also right that the beta version shows only a sliver of what we can already do today: heat transfer, thermo-elasticity, heterogeneous materials,…"
Aug 11, 2010
Ernest McCrank posted a discussion

plans for flow analysis?

I too am impressed by what I'm seeing here. Looks like it's a great tool for increasing the intelligence of our Rhino models.As I understand it, this beta version is just a sample of what can be done with this analysis technique. Are there plans for mold flow analysis in the near future?Cheers,ErnestSee More
Aug 11, 2010

Ernest McCrank's Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Scan-and-Solve for Rhino to add comments!

Join Scan-and-Solve for Rhino

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

FOLLOW SCAN&SOLVE

Scan&Solve on TwitterScan&Solve on Facebook

© 2013   Created by Michael Freytag.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service