All Discussions Tagged 'Force' - Scan-and-Solve for Rhino2024-03-29T02:38:00Zhttp://www.scan-and-solve.com/forum/topic/listForTag?tag=Force&feed=yes&xn_auth=noOffice Chair Analysistag:www.scan-and-solve.com,2011-09-15:6083097:Topic:206192011-09-15T07:40:46.756ZRendy Himawanhttp://www.scan-and-solve.com/profile/RendyHimawan
<p>Hello,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I need Your feedback about correct methods on chair testing. I have no experience with CAD analysis and simulation before. </p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996361?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996361?profile=RESIZE_480x480" width="360"></img></a> I have scanned and solved the <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">backrest (blue part),</span></strong> and need Your help to see whether my analysis was correct or not (attached report in .html):</p>
<ol>
<li>The…</li>
</ol>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I need Your feedback about correct methods on chair testing. I have no experience with CAD analysis and simulation before. </p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996361?profile=original"><img class="align-full" width="360" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996361?profile=RESIZE_480x480"/></a>I have scanned and solved the <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">backrest (blue part),</span></strong> and need Your help to see whether my analysis was correct or not (attached report in .html):</p>
<ol>
<li>The restrained part <strong>(1)</strong> and loaded area <strong>(2)</strong> were indicated at below figure: </li>
<li><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996400?profile=original"><img class="align-full" width="360" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2311996400?profile=RESIZE_480x480"/></a>Loaded type was <strong>scalar force: 1,000 Newtons.</strong> I simply assumed the loaded force on the area should be around 100 kilograms. </li>
<li>Material applied was <strong>Nylon 610.</strong> It replaced Poly Amide with 30% GF composite.</li>
</ol>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Could I validate this test?</strong></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Or, any other factor I might skipped during the test? Also, were there any incorrect number (or method) in the test?</p>
<p>There are two .html reports attached: 03---SnS---Report.html (loaded with scalar force: 1,000 Newtons) and 04---SnS---Report.html (loaded with scalar force: 10,000 Newtons).</p>
<p>On second report, there were no danger level indicated.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Many thanks. :)</p>